I like Sun lenses, they were one of the few companies to make their own
lenses in a time when many of the popular brands were just distributors putting
their name on other companies designs. The company started off some time soon
after the second world war rising from the ashes of the K.O.L lens company. They
initially made lenses for the Leica screw mount and one of the appealing
qualities of their lenses is that they continued to make lenses that were
aesthetically pleasing in a time when other brands were becoming a sea of dull
blackness. The company appears to have ceased the production of 35mm lenses in
the late 80's but the company still seems to exist as a manufacturer of
industrial lenses, on their website they claim to have began operating in the
late 80's but had a past in the 35mm lens industry so there is surely a
connection but how deep or shallow it is I have no idea.
On to the lens
Sun lenses always seem to have some sort of quirk or gimmick, be it the
styling of the lens or some kind of function that makes it distinctive in some
way compared to rivals and that is why they appeal to me as a collector. The
slightly unusual aspect is of course the F/2.5 maximum aperture as opposed to
the more usual F/2.8
Build quality and finish
This 28mm lens is in fact one of their later and more sober looking lenses
although it still has a funky logo on the lens cap. It's well put together which
seems to be a consistent trait of sun lens but optically it's a mixed
bag..........Also a consistent trait!
Image quality
The main problem when the lens is wide open is a tendency to produce bloom in
areas of contrast which can make focusing a difficult task, when you are very
close to critical focus the bloom appears and gives the impression of softness
so the lens almost looks sharper when it is just outside of perfect focus, you
have to go against your instincts because if you try to set the focus ring at a
point where the blooming is absent you will get a soft image.
The sharpness wide open is not bad in the centre but poor at the edges,
unfortunately the edges don't really come up to scratch until F/8-F/11 but I
find myself using this aperture a lot with wider angle lenses anyway. The lens
also makes a fairly good portrait lens on my Olympus E-410 where it has a 56mm
equivalent focal length, in this situation I can use the lens wide open because
the subject is more often than not at the centre of the frame.
Where this optics strengths lay are no doubt in the colour and contrast
department, there is a very appealing warmth and enthusiasm to the colours this
lens produces and the contrast is gives a decent pop that almost makes up for
the lack or resolution at wider apertures.
The bokeh is interesting in that it is very smooth wide open but at smaller
apertures has a strange almost ring shaped appearance on highlights, almost like
a mirror lens. I like it personally but then again I like mirror lens bokeh so
I'm a Judas in any case!
There follows some samples which can be clicked on to see a larger version.
This one was at F/2.5:
This one was taken at F/5.6:
This one is a stitch of two photos taken at F/5.6:
This one is F/5.6:
Conclusion
In conclusion I would have to say
it's hard to recommended In general even if I am quite fond of it
personally, it's optical performance is average and whilst it is strong
in the colour and contrast departments it let's itself down in other
areas. If I was not a fan of Sun lenses in general I would probably sell
the lens on but there is just something about it that I cannot quite put
my finger on. If you are in the market for a lens of this kind of spec
and price I would recommend looking out for a Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8
which is a class act in comparison and has much better edge performance
and is acceptably sharp across the frame. Another option would be the
Tamron adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, it doesn't quite have the sharpness of the
Tokina but it does have that same slightly faster maximum aperture as
the sun lens but without the blooming.
1 comments:
Hey there,
I got my hands on a Sun lens. 28mm f2.5. Do you happen to know what mount it uses?
Post a Comment